Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kamil Majchrzak vs Juan Pablo Paz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Majchrzak vs Paz analysis and find out who is favored!
Kamil Majchrzak vs Juan Pablo Paz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Majchrzak 2 - 0 Paz
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Majchrzak has won 59.57% of points on their second serve, while Paz has won 49.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Majchrzak, in recent form, has won 53.62% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paz has won 51.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.25% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Majchrzak has saved 69.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paz has saved 52.56% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Majchrzak has won 82.22% of matches played (W/L 37/ 8), with Paz winning 54.84% (W/L 34/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Majchrzak has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 220/ 115), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 38/ 29). Paz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 440/ 301), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Majchrzak has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 21/ 3), where as Paz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Majchrzak winning 2 times and Paz being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Majchrzak winning 4 and Paz winning 0. The last match between Majchrzak and Paz was at the Kigali 1 Challenger, 28-02-2024, Second, Clay with Kamil Majchrzak getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:31:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Majchrzak and Paz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Majchrzak winning 0 times and Paz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Majchrzak winning 0, and Paz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Majchrzak has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.56 while Paz has played against players with an average rank of 287.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Majchrzak has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paz has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Majchrzak has converted 46.47% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paz has converted 40.88% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
290
Rank
75
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
586
Rank
284
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
64% (370-210)
Career Total W/L
58% (449-319)
82% (37-8)
YTD W/L
40% (8-12)
$867,345
Career Prize Money
$2,105
4
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Juan Pablo Paz |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:31:39 | 0:31:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (33/49) | 70% (26/37) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (26/33) | 50% (13/26) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 45% (5/11) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (19/37) | 29% (14/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
70%
(
26 of
37)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kamil Majchrzak | Juan Pablo Paz |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (37/8) | 40% (8/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 78% (76/22) | 45% (20/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 64% (548/308) | 49% (196/208) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (16/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 86% (19/3) | 40% (8/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 170 | 44 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.28 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:20 | 1:43:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.56 | 233.55 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1502/2432) | 65% (807/1249) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1137/1502) | 64% (517/807) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 60% (554/930) | 50% (219/442) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (145/312) | 42% (55/132) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1135/2579) | 40% (519/1298) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (15/5) | 33% (3/6) |
| Futures W/L | 88% (21/3) | 45% (5/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (37/44) | 37% (7/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 80% (4/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 0% (0/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (37/36) | 67% (12/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (37/0) | 33% (12/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (8/0) |
Kamil Majchrzak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Ryan Seggerman
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
99)
6
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
63%
(
26 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
108
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(2) 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Alexander Weis
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
90%
(
37 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Jonas Forejtek
55%
(
42 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jie Cui
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
38 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(7) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Karim-Mohamed Maamoun
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
80%
(
47 of
59)
5
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
22%
(
10 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Juan Pablo Paz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Michele Ribecai
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aldin Setkic
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
80%
(
44 of
55)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Christian Fellin
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Juarez
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Petr Brunclik
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Biagio Gramaticopolo
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
45 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
63%
(
71 of
112)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
5
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
45%
(
50 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
41 of
61)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
27%
(
19 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Boris Kozlov
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Majchrzak Vs Paz Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
